A key crime and courts bill
stating proposals to reform community punishment by Ken Clarke, has been
dismissed by justice secretary Chris Grayling. Grayling plans to ’spice up’ the
bill, revealing his new approach on Tuesday, claiming he wants to be the ‘tough
justice secretary’ by imposing more punitive community sentences. He believes
“more competition, more outsourcing and more payment by results” is the way
forward. Probation sources write that Gray has dismissed Clarke’s proposal for
community sentences as he does not want them to be an alternative to custody.
The 220,000 offenders, that receive community sentences every year, could be
subject to 24-hours tagging, satellite tracking and the seizing and selling of
their assets and property, some of which were under consideration already. He
has also postponed the legislation that is essential in setting up the new
national crime agency. This move comes about as NAPO, the probation union,
fight to stop the privatization of the probation, stating this would result in
poorer protection of the public due to staff cuts in training and fewer staff
overall. A private company already handle the supervision of low and medium
risk offenders. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said this move was to bring
about innovation through competition, or is this just quality and effectiveness
lost to ideology?
The day-to-day, blow-by-blow account of David v Goliath, in which the good little guy (social enterprise, private and institutional investment, best practise, third sector and localism) wins. Taking the power back from big bad Government and effecting local solutions through community action. Think social justice. On Red Bull. Eventually.
Showing posts with label alternatives to custody. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alternatives to custody. Show all posts
Friday, 5 October 2012
Saturday, 30 July 2011
Locking up women with mental health needs.
The female population in custody has different demographic characteristics to the male population, with 19% being foreign nationals, and 29% being of an ethnic minority compared to 13% and 27% respectively for men (Prison Service, 2010). Half the women in prison have experienced domestic violence, and women are
twice as likely as men to have experienced some form of mental illness in the year preceding their
admission to custody (Singleton et al., 1998).
Sixty-five per cent of imprisoned women have substance use problems, compared to 70% of men (Social Exclusion Task Force, 2009). Worryingly, 83% of women in prison have a longstanding illness, compared with 32% of the general female population, and many are on prescription medication (HM Chief Inspector of
Prisons, 2009).
From a report by the Centre for Mental Health
http://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/pdfs/under_the_radar.pdf
twice as likely as men to have experienced some form of mental illness in the year preceding their
admission to custody (Singleton et al., 1998).
Sixty-five per cent of imprisoned women have substance use problems, compared to 70% of men (Social Exclusion Task Force, 2009). Worryingly, 83% of women in prison have a longstanding illness, compared with 32% of the general female population, and many are on prescription medication (HM Chief Inspector of
Prisons, 2009).
From a report by the Centre for Mental Health
http://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/pdfs/under_the_radar.pdf
Saturday, 4 June 2011
Judge Justin and Justice that works
His special pilot drug court boasts a 20% re-ffending rate, 1/3 of the national average. He'd rather hug a druggie and apply some structure, programmes and accountibility to his life than chuck him a jail sentence.
"According to figures supplied by the judge - who is patron of an anti-drug charity and serves on the Council on Misuse of Drugs - an average 60 per cent of his 'clients' did not reoffend while under the court order and 20 per cent became drug-free. The National Drug Treatment Agency's average is just three per cent."
Soft? No. Sensible? Oh yes.
Hugging druggies
"According to figures supplied by the judge - who is patron of an anti-drug charity and serves on the Council on Misuse of Drugs - an average 60 per cent of his 'clients' did not reoffend while under the court order and 20 per cent became drug-free. The National Drug Treatment Agency's average is just three per cent."
Soft? No. Sensible? Oh yes.
Hugging druggies
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

